IJSP Number 5, 2023

64 3.3. DATA ANALYSES The qualitative data were analyzed in two steps. The first step involved sorting the data based on the open-ended question domains and identification of themes using the Dedoose software (Version 8.0.35) which utilizes both deductive and inductive approaches. This software has been used in several qualitative and mixed- method studies [19, 20, 21]. After the initial analysis conducted by the Dedoose software, the second step involved a research team of four members, including two pre/postdoctoral trainees in counseling psychology and two counseling psychologists (two women and two men), further analyzing the data. Each team member independently checked on and modified the initial themes sorted out by the software, which were then discussed, defined, and compared until a consensus was reached on the identified themes and sub-themes [22]. Reflexivity. In order to account for any potential biases from personal or experiential backgrounds that could influence the analysis and conclusions of the study, our team employed the practice of reflexivity. Reflexivity is a practice used in qualitative research in order to account for how a researcher’s subjectivity may shape the data and preventing, as much as possible, falling into any biases that may stop from communicating the participants’ full experiences [23]. First, we recognized that our team was comprised of both Asian and Latinx perspectives and discussed potential blind spots with our different ethnic backgrounds. Second, we discussed how these experiences may have also been shaped based on our individual locations in the states with different sociopolitical backgrounds (Texas vs California), and how we negotiated our own international background when encountering U.S. cultural and societal norms. By recognizing these lived experiences, we strived to keep an open mind to the perceptions shared by experienced supervisors in working with international trainees. While interpreting the data, we were also mindful about how supervisors may not necessarily share overtly explicit details or negative experiences, given their role in our research and their own perceived privileged status. Triangulation. In order to further lend credence to our study and corroborate our data analysis, we used the investigator triangulation method [24] by employing an external auditor review our project after finalizing our findings. The external auditor was previously an international trainee with a Latinx background, having earned their doctoral degree in the United States in Counseling Psychology, and currently being a Licensed Psychologist, clinical supervisor in a Counseling Psychology doctoral program. The external auditor examined the research questions and data, as well as all codes and themes identified from them. Based on the auditor’s feedback, the primary research team revisited some of the themes until agreed adjustments were achieved. 4. RESULTS Three themes were extracted from the data. They included (1) systemic issues, acculturation, and power differential; (2) reciprocal learning and supervisory relationship; and (3) effective supervision strategies.