IJSP Number 1, 2019

30 given by the participants to the research), the professor role gaining the second position (as opposed to the results of the participants, who chose the consultant role). The latter two roles, the consultant and the professor one, with different positions depending on the subject under assessment, highlight an interesting dynamics in changing role-playing games in supervision. Furthermore, it is considered that uninterrupted therapeutic practice keeps the supervisor in touch with social reality. For the academic supervisor, private practice brings him/her “with his/her feet on the ground”, being constantly preoccupied not to turn therapy and supervision into teaching. According to the third hypothesis, elements of the Supervision Alliance (focus on relationship and client focus) did not show significant differences in the three training centres. In other words, if the supervisor builds a relationship - focused supervision and also focused on the clear establishment of objectives, the supervisee recognizes the supervisor’s role in their self-efficacy. The limitations of this study refer to the limited number of attending subjects, the therapists in the supervision stage. The assessment of supervision, of supervision styles, and of the supervisory alliance has been realized only for a supervisor within the association. In the future, it is suggested to carry out an evaluation of the supervision process and activity also in other professional training associations in psychotherapy with the involvement of a larger number of supervisors subject to evaluation in order to compare the results obtained. Does the therapeutic orientation influence the assessment of supervision, the supervision styles and the supervision alliance? REFERENCES [1] Drobot L. & Popescu O. M. (2013). Manual de psihoterapie integrativă , Bucharest: Didactic and Pedagogic Publishing House. [2] Vîşcu L.-I. & Popescu O.-M., (2016). Psihoterapie integrativă strategică. Teorie şi aplicaţii practice, Craiova: Liber Mundi Publishing House [3] Popescu O. M. & Vîşcu L.-I. (2017). Factorii comuni în psihoterapie. O abordare integrativ-strategică , Bucharest: Pro Universitaria Publishing House [4] Lehrman-Wateraman, D. Şi Ladany, N. (2001). Development and validation of the evaluation process within supervision inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 48(2), 168-177, Copyright © 1990 American Psychological Association. in Bernard J.M. & Goodyear R.K. (2017), Bazele supervizării clinice , trad. Raluca Hurduc, Bucharest: Trei, pp. 573-574. [5] Eftation, J.F., Patton, M.J. şi Kardash, C.M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision . Journal of Counseling Psychology , 37, 322-329, Copyright ©